Return to CounterHeg Home
Maayo bga adlaw,
Brazilian Democracy Faces Obstacles from the North
Court Says First Amendment Doesn't Shield Nike From Suit
BUSH'S HIT LIST AT THE UNITED NATIONS
Historical Examples of US Involvement in Dirty Wars
Workers Struggles: Europe, the Middle East and Africa
Project Censored: NAFTA Destroys Farming Communities at Home and
Abroad
Chavez: borrowed time?
The Netherlands: social democrats eulogize murdered neo-fascist Pim
Fortuyn
ISRAEL, THE OCCUPIED WEST BANK AND GAZA STRIP, AND THE PALESTINIAN
AUTHORITY
TERRITORIES
Nepal Solidarity Network
COMING OUT OF THE CANNABIS CLOSET
***
Brazilian Democracy Faces Obstacles from the North
Common Dreams News Center
http://commondreams.org/views02/0508-07.htm
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL -- In this slum carved out of the hilltops
overlooking Rio de Janeiro, Claudia de Andrade Burgo explains why she
plans
to vote for Lula, the presidential candidate of the Workers' Party, in
Brazil's 2002 elections. "He is from the people -- the poorer
classes. The
Workers' Party is more likely to create jobs."
Claudia is a 31-year-old single mother with two children, who earns about
$40 a month for childcare work. She has lived all her life in Jacarezinho,
a
favela -- one of the slums surrounding Rio, where drug dealers are often
the
law and police fear to tread. She is ready for change in Brazil.
But unknown to Claudia, her vote could be cancelled by the decisions of
Wall
Street firms some 5000 miles away. Last week Luis Ignacio da Silva -- or
Lula as he is popularly known -- pulled ahead in the polls. He scored 38
percent, with the nearest competitor at 16 percent.
Brazil's financial markets showed no reaction, until the US financial
giants
Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter downgraded Brazilian bonds in
response to the polls. The Brazilian stock market dropped more than 4
percent in one day, and the press broadcast Wall Street's warnings far and
wide.
The power of these firms to move financial markets -- and thereby
intimidate
the electorate -- is a growing threat to democracy in Brazil, as well as
in
other developing countries....
*
Court Says First Amendment Doesn't Shield Nike From Suit
New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/03/business/03SWEA.html
California's highest court ruled yesterday that the First Amendment did
not
shield Nike from a lawsuit accusing it of fraud for asserting that its
overseas workers received adequate wages and that its working conditions
complied with safety regulations.
The California Supreme Court ruled that the fraud lawsuit should not be
dismissed, concluding that Nike's statements about its labor practices
were
commercial speech that did not deserve full First Amendment
protection.
Nike asserted that its defense of its labor practices was political speech
and thus deserved full protection under the First Amendment. The company
said its statements were part of an international media debate on issues
of
public interest.
The ruling was the latest effort to distinguish commercial speech, in
which
businesses can be held liable for false statements, from political speech,
in which the speaker enjoys broad protections, even when making false
statements....
*
BUSH'S HIT LIST AT THE UNITED NATIONS
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=13088
Quietly, and without the fanfare that accompanies the campaign in the
mountains of Afghanistan, the administration has begun a long march
through
multilateral institutions. At the UN and elsewhere, the U.S. has mounted a
campaign to purge international civil servants judged to be out of step
with
Washington in the war on terrorism and its insistence that the U.S. have
the
last word in all global governance issues.
The first and most prominent to go was Mary Robinson, the former Irish
president whose work as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has been
acclaimed by human rights groups across the world. Officially, she retired
after a one-year renewal of her contract. In fact, the U.S. ferociously
lobbied against here reappointment. UN officials and Western diplomats
also
said she was "difficult to work with" -- the usual euphemism for
not willing
to be dictated to. Most human rights activists see this as precisely her
strength in an organization where not rocking the boat seems to be
genetically engineered into many officials.
The U.S. could not forgive her for her stands on the Middle East issues or
for her endorsement last year of the results of the UN's Durban Conference
on Racism, which both the U.S. and Israel walked out of. The rest of the
world stayed and adopted a toned-down document, and subsequently
Washington
began its campaign to force Robinson out.
Another recent victim of the U.S. campaign was Robert Watson, the
much-respected chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. On
Apr. 19, the U.S. administration succeeded in replacing him with Rajendra
Pachauri, an Indian economist. The panel is (or perhaps was is the correct
tense) an independent scientific body established to assess the degree of
climate change and the contribution made by human activities such as
burning
fossil fuels. The panel's work had come to a consensus, not shared by the
Bush administration, that human activity is a factor in climate
change....
*
Historical Examples of US Involvement in Dirty Wars
9-11 Peace Newsletter
http://www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3
Over the years, the US government has supported coups that
brought a number of repressive and brutal regimes to power, as
well as the dirty wars which followed. Chile, Djakarta, El
Salvador, Iran - the list goes on. In many cases military regimes
replaced democratically elected leaders, and the killing sprees
which followed were justified by the US government as necessary
to wipe out communism--while being quietly covered up. The
following links are meant to provide an introduction to the many
notorious incidents that occurred from the 60's to the 80's. This
list is by no means exhaustive, but it should begin to shed some
light on the long history of questionable US foreign policies.
A CIA-backed coup and massacre in Indonesia in the 1960's may
have taken the lives of up to a million people.
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/54b/032.html
Thousands of declassified CIA documents reveal that the CIA aided
in the overthrow of democratically elected Chilean President
Salvador Allende in the 70's, thus putting Augusto Pinochet into
power. You may have heard Pinochet's name before: his infamously
brutal regime saw thousands killed, tortured, and
"disappeared."
http://9-11peace.org/r.php3?r=194
Henry Kissinger played a key role in the overthrow of Allende.
This article explains his involvement (which he denies in his
memoirs), and details the many instances of direct US and CIA
involvement in the situation, such as setting up a fascist
organization run by a former PR person for the Ford Motor
Company.
http://www.wsws.org/news/1998/oct1998/kis-o21.shtml
This article on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of
Argentina's dirty war describes how it began with a coup and led
to the disappearance of thousands of people during the 70's.
http://9-11peace.org/r.php3?r=195
Evidence shows that US approval was also expressed for
Argentina's dirty war, again through the influence of Henry
Kissinger.
http://9-11peace.org/r.php3?r=196
Reagan-era support for brutal counterinsurgency operations in
Guatemala and Nicaragua has generally not received the coverage
in the States that it deserves. This article details the former
President's complicity in Guatemala, in order to make the
argument that the US must face up to its own history.
http://www.consortiumnews.com/1999/052699a1.html
This article lives up to its title, "What everyone should know
about Nicaragua." The author provides a clear and concise
explanation of how the US used brutal contras (rebel groups) to
try to overthrow the democratically elected Nicaraguan government
in the 80's, including how this history led to the adamant US
support for one candidate rather than the other in the post-Sept.
11 Nicaraguan elections.
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2001-11/09weisbrot.cfm
Senator Jesse Helms has praised Pinochet and a former military
officer who ran death squads in El Salvador, and was involved in
supporting anti-communism actions during the Cold War. In fact,
his efforts to eliminate communism led Senator Helms to support a
Nicaraguan rebel group that has turned out to be one of the
contra groups most heavily involved in narcotrafficking.
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0797/helm01.htm
US support of groups in Colombia have helped contribute to deaths
and human rights violations there.
http://www.zmag.org/crisescurevts/colombia/tdeath.htm
*
Workers Struggles: Europe, the Middle East and Africa
WSWS
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/may2002/lab-m09.shtml
German engineers and electrical workers union continues strike action +
Council workers in London to strike + French medical practitioners strike
continues + French foundry workers continue strike action over pay and
conditions + Israeli unions protest social cost of war + Israeli pilots
threaten strike action + Zimbabwean textile workers protest ill treatment
+
Ugandan dam operators on sit-down strike + Zimbabwean gold miners strike
against non-payment
*
Project Censored: NAFTA Destroys Farming Communities at Home and
Abroad
Censored Alerts
http://www.projectcensored.org/
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) are responsible for the impoverishment of and exodus
of
small farms in Mexico and Haiti. NAFTA is also causing the economic
destruction of rural farming communities in the United States and Canada.
The resulting loss of rural employment has created a landslide of
socio-economic and environmental consequences that will only worsen with
the
continued dismantling and deregulation of trade barriers.
When NAFTA came before Congress in 1993, U.S. farmers were told that the
agreement would open the borders of Mexico and Canada, enabling them to
sell
their superior products and achieve previously unknown prosperity.
Corporations whom operate throughout the Americas, such as Tyson and
Cargill, have since used the farming surplus to drive down costs, pitting
farmers against each other and prohibiting countries from taking
protective
actions.
Since the enactment of NAFTA, 80% of the foodstuffs coming into the US are
products that displace crops raised here at home. NAFTA has allowed
multinational middlemen to increase production in Mexico, where they can
profit from much cheaper labor, as well as freely use pesticides banned in
the US.
In both Mexico and Haiti, NAFTA policies have caused an exodus from rural
areas forcing people to live on city streets, accepting low paid labor and
sweatshop conditions. Farmers in Mexico, unable to compete with the
large-scale importation and chemical-intensive mass production of US
agricultural corporations, are swimming in a corn surplus that has swelled
approximately 450% since NAFTA's implementation. Haiti's deregulation of
trade with the US has destroyed the island's rice industry in a similar
manner. Resulting urban slums are contributing to the breakdown of
cultural
traditions and public authority, making the growing masses increasingly
ungovernable.
The Mexican government clashes violently with any organized dissent
towards
NAFTA. Protests in Chiapas and in Central Mexico have lead to the reported
arrest, injury and death of dozens of activists. Community leaders like
Minister Lucius Walker, executive of the Interreligious Foundation for
Community Organization, state that, "The biggest challenge facing all
of us
in this new millennium is to build a citizens' movement to counter the
corporate captivity of the Americas."
The1993 NAFTA agreement has created the desolation of small farming
communities, added loopholes to environmental precautions and
exploited
poor people throughout the Americas. With the scheduled 2009 lift on
tariffs and import restrictions, as well as Bush's proposed Free Trade
Area
of the Americas (FTAA) adding 31 more countries to the NAFTA agreement,
many
additional farming communities are in danger.
Synopsis by: Adam Cimino
*
Chavez: borrowed time?
Channel 4 News
http://www.channel4.com/news/cgi-bin/search.cgi?link=http://www.channel4.com/new\
s/home/20020509/Story05.htm
...President Chavez:
"Of course, it's a revolution, profound change in political, social
and
economic structures of the country, a profound ideological change. And
that's why we've seen such ferocious opposition from a privileged minority
who are trying to stop the course of the revolution. They will not
succeed."
The truth of what happened here a month ago still in the eye of the
beholder. But what's clear now is that the military overplayed its hand
by
first removing Chavez, then installing a right-wing puppet government that
promptly disbanded parliament and the supreme court, thereby allowing
Chavez
to stage a lightning counter-coup.
Clear as well that coup leaders acted only after being given a tacit green
light by the Americans...
*
The Netherlands: social democrats eulogize murdered neo-fascist Pim
Fortuyn
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/may2002/neth-m09.shtml
Only days before May 15 parliamentary elections, the assassination of
racist
demagogue Pim Fortuyn has set off political shockwaves in the Netherlands.
The event has exposed deep divisions in a society that carefully
maintained
a facade of political harmony based on consensus and tolerance.
Immediately after the news broke that the 54-year-old Fortuyn had been
fatally injured by five shots to his head, chest and neck, his supporters
rioted through the centre of The Hague, capital of the Netherlands. The
same
evening they engaged in violent street battles with police.
Mobile police units used water cannon and truncheons to counter the
right-wing rioters, who threw stones and bottles. Supporters of Fortuyn
were
able to force their way into an underground garage adjoining the
parliamentary building and set fire to a number of cars.
Together with election placards bearing his picture, many Fortuyn
supporters
wore swastikas and other Nazi symbols....
*
ISRAEL, THE OCCUPIED WEST BANK AND GAZA STRIP, AND THE PALESTINIAN
AUTHORITY
TERRITORIES
Human Rights Watch
http://hrw.org/reports/2002/israel3/
SUMMARY
...Despite these close quarters, the IDF had a legal duty to distinguish
civilians from military targets. At times, however, IDF military attacks
were indiscriminate, failing to make this distinction. Firing was
particularly indiscriminate on the morning of April 6, when missiles were
launched from helicopters, catching many sleeping civilians unaware. One
woman was killed by helicopter fire during that attack; a four-year-old
child in another part of the town was injured when a missile hit the house
where she was sleeping. Both were buildings housing only civilians, with
no
fighters in the immediate vicinity.
The IDF used armored bulldozers to demolish residents' homes. The apparent
purpose was to clear paths through Jenin's narrow and winding alleys to
enable their tanks and other heavy weaponry to penetrate the camp
interior,
particularly since some of these had evidently been booby-trapped.
However,
particularly in the Hawashin district, the destruction extended well
beyond
any conceivable purpose of gaining access to fighters, and was vastly
disproportionate to the military objectives pursued. The damage to Jenin
camp by missile and tank fire and bulldozer destruction has shocked many
observers. At least 140 buildings-most of them multi-family dwellings-were
completely destroyed in the camp, and severe damage caused to more than
200
others has rendered them uninhabitable or unsafe. An estimated 4,000
people,
more than a quarter of the population of the camp, were rendered homeless
because of this destruction. Serious damage was also done to the water,
sewage and electrical infrastructure of the camp. More than one hundred of
the 140 completely destroyed buildings were in Hawashin district. In
contrast to other parts of the camp where bulldozers were used to widen
streets, the IDF razed the entire Hawashin district, where on April 9
thirteen IDF soldiers were killed in an ambush by Palestinian militants.
Establishing whether this extensive destruction so exceeded military
necessity as to constitute wanton destruction-or a war crime-should be one
of the highest priorities for the United Nations fact-finding mission.
The harm from this destruction was aggravated by the inadequate warning
given to civilian residents. Although warnings were issued on multiple
occasions by the IDF, many civilians only learned of the risk as
bulldozers
began to crush their houses. Jamal Fayid, a thirty-seven-year-old
paralyzed
man, was killed when the IDF bulldozed his home on top of him, refusing to
allow his relatives the time to remove him from the home.
Sixty-five-year-old Muhammad Abu Saba`a had to plead with an IDF bulldozer
operator to stop demolishing his home while his family remained inside;
when
he returned to his half-demolished home, he was shot dead by an Israeli
soldier.
Human Rights Watch has confirmed that at least fifty-two Palestinians were
killed as a result of IDF operations in Jenin. This figure may rise as
rescue and investigative work proceeds, and as family members detained by
Israel are located or released. Due to the low number of people reported
missing, Human Rights Watch does not expect this figure to increase
substantially. At least twenty-two of those confirmed dead were civilians,
including children, physically disabled, and elderly people. At least
twenty-seven of those confirmed dead were suspected to have been armed
Palestinians belonging to movements such as Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and the
al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigades. Some were members of the Palestinian
Authority's
(PA) National Security Forces or other branches of the PA police and
security forces. Human Rights watch was unable to determine conclusively
the
status of the remaining three killed, among the cases documented....
*
Nepal Solidarity Network Mission
Nepal Solidarity Network
http://vm.uconn.edu/~ser00003/NS.html
The Nepal Solidarity Network is meant to be a resource for people
committed to working to help resolve the ongoing conflict in Nepal
and working toward a true and just peace, rather than a solution by
military force by either side. We hope to avoid needless bloodshed of
any human being, and work for economic and social justice and true
democracy in Nepal. We are nonpartisan and do not affiliate
ideologically with either side in the conflict, but wish to work in
solidarity with the people of Nepal, who like all people deserve to
live dignified lives in peace. But, very importantly, a true and just
peace doesn't simply mean a lack of bloodshed. It also includes the
need to focus on issues of structural violence: economic inequality,
global imperialism, caste/race oppression, patriarchal oppression,
and other forms of "quiet" violence that partly underlie the
current
conflict. These issues must at least be included in the dialogue.
Without addressing these issues, a cease-fire will be a welcome yet
hollow peace.
*
COMING OUT OF THE CANNABIS CLOSET
Alternet
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=13059
Jodi James is a 34-year-old single mother of two, a Democratic candidate
for
the Florida House of Representatives and a marijuana smoker. James, who
made
a point of disclosing her marijuana use at the Florida state Democratic
convention, is one of a growing number of people who believe it's time for
pot smokers to step forward and challenge their negative stereotype.
"If many prominent people come out of the closet, it will change the
idea
that we have to hide, that we have to be ashamed," James says.
"Coming out
on this issue will change what will be okay for other politicians to
do."
Some politicians have already been forced out of the closet, or have come
out on their own. Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City, was
revealed to be a marijuana smoker by the National Organization for the
Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), which ran a series of advertisements
featuring Bloomberg's reply to a reporter who asked him last summer if he
had smoked marijuana, "You bet I did," said Bloomberg, "and
I enjoyed it."
...
Return to CounterHeg Home